Anderson Ignite FP: IFP Fastpitch

Anderson Ignite FP: IFP Fastpitch Images

$189.99 With Free Shipping

1 Review

Quick Info Reviews Q& A

-11 Length to Weight Ratio
2 1/4 Inch Barrel Diameter
Approved for Play in ASA, USSSA, NSA, ISA, ISF
Ergonomic Weldless Knob
Free Shipping!
Full Twelve (12) Month Manufacturer's Warranty

Lower M.O.I. Means Faster Swing Speeds
SG-I Sport Grip
Single Wall All-Metal Alloy
TaperFlex Contour
TrueFlex End Cap
Ultra-Thin Whip Handle

by cobiglion - Nov 02, 2011

Pros: This bat was hot right out of the wrapper. My 11 year old daughter has become more of a power hitter with this bat. Before this bat it was a single everytime, now she's always on third.. I would recommend this bat for the young ladies out there that need a little more pop in their swing.. Also I would like to add that the bat is slightly end loaded...

Cons: Paint chips easily, but it doesn't effect the distance and pop one bit....

Was this review helpful?

New for 2012! The new Anderson Ignite fastpitch bat features a complete redesign of Anderson's popular single wall alloy technology. The Ignite is designed to maximize Anderson's all-metal alloy, with a shape that optimizes the player's swing. This new alloy has a greater yield value and added strength that allows a lighter, more responsive, and larger Effective Hitting Area (EHA). Reducing the weight in the EHA, while maintaining the strength necessary to withstand impact, allows for greater design versatility including a significantly reduced Moment of Inertia (MOI). Optimizing the MOI makes it possible for players to swing the bat faster, with less effort. The Ignite is topped off with a TrueFlex End Cap that is designed to increase barrel strength and aid in vibration managment. Also helping eliminate annoying vibrations is the TaperFlex Contour which uses a proprietary combination of design mapping and wall-thickness tuning to prevent energy from escaping the barrel. Furthermore, an SG-I Sport Grip absorbs any stray shockwaves that might make it down to the ultra-thin whip handle. All of this technology is used to efficiently manage energy transfer and produce the most explosive hits for fastpitch players! Anderson: Manufactured With Pride in the U.S.A.! The Ignite is backed by a Full Twelve (12) Month Manufacturer's Warranty. Free Shipping!

Avg. Customer Review

1 Reviews

Review This Bat

1 Product Reviews

100%

by cobiglion - Nov 02, 2011

Cons: Paint chips easily, but it doesn't effect the distance and pop one bit....

Was this review helpful?

Have A Question?

Ask our community of experts and receive an answer within 24 hours.

Ask Question

How does this bat compare to the 2010 compare to the Techzilla??

Asked by Buckshot on Jan 25, 2012

Anderson made upgrades in their aluminum alloy technology since 2010. The Ignite is going to be one of their top sellers

Ryan Expert · Jan 26, 2012

I am new to the fast pitch softball world. My daughter is 12 yrs. She is a big girl. She just started batting lessons. Her coach suggested to start looking at 32 length and no more than 22oz. I don't know the difference between bat types( single wall, composite) Are they all plastic/part??

Asked by John 79 on Jan 16, 2012

This is a single wall alloy bat, there isn't any plastic on the bat. I would suggest a 32 inch 21 oz.

Kara Expert · Jan 16, 2012

Is this bat better used for fastpitch or slowpitch?

Asked by rachel on Nov 09, 2011

It will be better used in fastpitch softball.

KG Expert · Nov 09, 2011

I want to know which Anderson bat is built for the best performance, I need a comparison between the ignite FP bat and the Rocket tech bat, and whitch Anderson bat is just flat out better than the Worth 454, if you can provide me with all the information I need, I will buy the better bat.

Asked by Rick on Sep 16, 2011

By Anderson's standards, the NanoTek is their top-of-the-line and best performing bat followed by the RockeTech, TechZilla, Ignite and KFP in that order. It's hard to say if any Anderson will flat out, out-perform the 454 from Worth. I've heard great things about the 454 so far and it is a high-performing bat. It would be very difficult to recommend many bats over the new 454s. Based on feedback though, I would put the 454 on par with the NanoTek and RockeTech in terms of performance.

John Expert · Sep 19, 2011